Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2019 11:46:00 GMT
If the .223 is unreliable
If the .223 is unreliable, why is the 5.56 still in circulation on the battlefield?
The .22 can down games like you would not believe. People DO hunt deer with it. The 5.56 is used for hunting Aligators by people in Florida and even used to hunt medium built games such as boars, deers, wolves and even foxes.
Even in battle, the .22 is such a pain to everyone who caught a shot of it. Due to it's size of the bullet despite it's high velocity, it often gets trapped in the person's body and if this is a headshot, no chance of even taking it out and even if a person tries to, he would be finding it impossible to and the victim would just bleed and die while his buddy or friend finds the bullet in his body.
How many Marine Snipers in Vietnam used the Ruger .22 Silenced to kill dogs and NVA sentries? So It's not just the diameter that matters.
The shape of the .223 versus the .22lr (pictured) combined with the huge differences in powder charge of the rounds equates to a LOT more muzzle energy for the .223. As far as .223 versus 5.56, same round essentially but the 5.56 case is thicker and built to handle the higher pressure loads used by the military.
A 5.56 chambered rifle can be used with .223 ammo but you should never use the 5.56 NATO in a .223 chambered rifle. The shorter throat, or Leade, of the .223 can cause dangerously high pressure in the chamber leading to a catastrophic failure or at a minimum deformed casings or cycling issues.
Well the .223 ends here in the dustbin? No way: This cartridge needs only a little commercial advertisement.
IF THIS IS YOUR FORUM TOO! Post your opinion below PLS. What do you think about this?
If the .223 is unreliable, why is the 5.56 still in circulation on the battlefield?
The .22 can down games like you would not believe. People DO hunt deer with it. The 5.56 is used for hunting Aligators by people in Florida and even used to hunt medium built games such as boars, deers, wolves and even foxes.
Even in battle, the .22 is such a pain to everyone who caught a shot of it. Due to it's size of the bullet despite it's high velocity, it often gets trapped in the person's body and if this is a headshot, no chance of even taking it out and even if a person tries to, he would be finding it impossible to and the victim would just bleed and die while his buddy or friend finds the bullet in his body.
How many Marine Snipers in Vietnam used the Ruger .22 Silenced to kill dogs and NVA sentries? So It's not just the diameter that matters.
The shape of the .223 versus the .22lr (pictured) combined with the huge differences in powder charge of the rounds equates to a LOT more muzzle energy for the .223. As far as .223 versus 5.56, same round essentially but the 5.56 case is thicker and built to handle the higher pressure loads used by the military.
A 5.56 chambered rifle can be used with .223 ammo but you should never use the 5.56 NATO in a .223 chambered rifle. The shorter throat, or Leade, of the .223 can cause dangerously high pressure in the chamber leading to a catastrophic failure or at a minimum deformed casings or cycling issues.
Well the .223 ends here in the dustbin? No way: This cartridge needs only a little commercial advertisement.
IF THIS IS YOUR FORUM TOO! Post your opinion below PLS. What do you think about this?