Post by magnum on Nov 18, 2019 0:15:08 GMT
How authentic are the 400 pages of leaked documents that The New York Times claims is a smoking gun concerning China's policies toward radicalized Uighur Muslims
Godfree Roberts, Ed.D. Education & Geopolitics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1973)
The Times–which promoted the Iraq war and the Trump impeachment based on inauthentic documents–presents no evidence that the Xinjiang documents are authentic. The Times simply says:
The papers were brought to light by a member of the Chinese political establishment who requested anonymity and expressed hope that their disclosure would prevent party leaders, including Mr. Xi, from escaping culpability for the mass detentions.
The Times does not mention the well-documented fact that US Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. recently confessed, "The CIA programs in Tibet, which were very effective in destabilizing it, did not succeed in Xinjiang. There were similar efforts made with the Uyghurs during the Cold War that never really got off the ground. In both cases you had religion waved as a banner in support of a desire for independence or autonomy which is, of course, is anathema to any state. I do believe that people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones applies here. I am part American Indian and those people are not here (in the US) in the numbers they once were because of severe genocidal policies on the part of the European majority”.
The Times also does not mention the well-documented fact that the US jails undocumented immigrants’ children in wire cages without even a toothbrush. the well-documented fact those US-trained Uyghur terrorists have massacred thousands of Chinese.
Instead, the Times merely says, “trust us.”
Why would anyone trust The Times when the world’s leading Muslim nations, after sending inspectors to Xinjiang, announced that the Uyghurs there are being treated far more humanely than undocumented immigrants in America?
Godfree Roberts, Ed.D. Education & Geopolitics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1973)
The Times–which promoted the Iraq war and the Trump impeachment based on inauthentic documents–presents no evidence that the Xinjiang documents are authentic. The Times simply says:
The papers were brought to light by a member of the Chinese political establishment who requested anonymity and expressed hope that their disclosure would prevent party leaders, including Mr. Xi, from escaping culpability for the mass detentions.
The Times does not mention the well-documented fact that US Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. recently confessed, "The CIA programs in Tibet, which were very effective in destabilizing it, did not succeed in Xinjiang. There were similar efforts made with the Uyghurs during the Cold War that never really got off the ground. In both cases you had religion waved as a banner in support of a desire for independence or autonomy which is, of course, is anathema to any state. I do believe that people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones applies here. I am part American Indian and those people are not here (in the US) in the numbers they once were because of severe genocidal policies on the part of the European majority”.
The Times also does not mention the well-documented fact that the US jails undocumented immigrants’ children in wire cages without even a toothbrush. the well-documented fact those US-trained Uyghur terrorists have massacred thousands of Chinese.
Instead, the Times merely says, “trust us.”
Why would anyone trust The Times when the world’s leading Muslim nations, after sending inspectors to Xinjiang, announced that the Uyghurs there are being treated far more humanely than undocumented immigrants in America?
